Tuesday 29 April 2014

Child Development Theories

Sundus Al Ghafri 

Abstract

This assignment mentions four child development theories from different theorists and explores all the theories. With results from questioners I was able to see how well the theories were agreed or disagreed by different people. Each question is based on one of the four theories, which I explained in the methodology. I then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each theory and put my on input on why the results came out the way it did. In the end I concluded by mentioning all the theories that were stated in this essay.

Introduction

            Child development is the most important part in a child’s growth. Child development is how children can do difficult and complicated things, as they get older. The development of a child was not of interest to anyone in the past, it was only in the early 20th century when studies on child development was conducted, however these researches were all about the child’s abnormal behaviour. Eventually the typical child development began to form interest in researchers. In this essay I will explain four of many of the child development theories that are an important aspect in the growth and progression of a child.

Literature Review
            There are many theories on how children develop; I’ll just mention four. Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory talks about how the child perceives the world, the need to interact with things physically in order to understand them. Another theory is Skinner’s and Bijou’s Behavioural Child Development Theory where it focuses on how the environmental interactions affect a child’s behaviour, it looks at how our experiences shape us into who we are. Erikson’s Psychosocial Stage Theory explains that the social environments around the child will a have an affect on their social emotional growth. Gesell’s Maturational Theory describes that the child’s genes and biology is the reason for the behavioural traits and developmental trends in a child. Parents and teachers have little influence on their behaviour.
Methodology
            Each question is based on the theories of child development. The first question is about the environmental factors that affect a child. Secondly, the experience we have are often the reason we turn out they way we do. Third question suggest that a child to fully comprehend and understand what’s in front of them, they should physically interact with, And Lastly, the Maturation Theory believes that what ever behaviour a child perceives it is through their genes and that parents and teachers may have little o no affect on the child behavioural traits. All the questions can be found on the appendix.
            My research was conducted in Bayan College using the library facility to help. The research was done on April of 2012 with the help of my partner Melanie Marian Crasta with the questioners. Also, the help of Mr. Michael during class hours.

Results

Different people did fifteen questioners. The results show that the majority chose ‘Both’ in all the four theories. A few have disagreed with the theory, however the rest chose ‘Agree’ as their answer. These results show that everyone might not favour all of the theories different people have different ideas. Question 1 the theory of cognitive development showed balanced results. In question 2 of Behavioural Child Development Theory is displays the majority chose ‘Agree’ and ‘Both’ and a couple have selected ‘Disagree.’ Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory in question 3 presents to be both favourable and unfavourable it got the highest of them all. The last question was mostly agreed by everyone and disagreed with couple. Not many disagreed with the four theories.

Discussion
            Behavioral child development theory looks on how the atmospheres around us shape us to who we are, however; it completely ignores the affects of one’s thoughts and feelings. Piaget’s Cognitive Development theory indicates that a child should interact physically in order for them to understand it, which basically means that if they don’t they will never learn. Everyone has a different way of understanding things some by observing and others by examining. The Psychosocial Theory of Erikson’s proposes that the social environment around us has a great impact in our social an emotional growth, but with the advancement of technology social interactions are becoming less and less.
            I think the results came out equalised, because most of the people related with all four theories, as did I.

Conclusion
            In conclusion I would like to say that all the four theories presented to be suitable, but not complete. Every theory is correct, in my opinion, we may learn from through interacting with the environment physically, we may benefit form the social environment around us, we may be who we are because of our genes that were passed along. At the end of the day we all need to strive for a better future for our kids and focus on how to make a better generation.




Sources
Aldridge. J., Goldman. R., (2007) Child Development Theories.
Cherry, K., (2012) Child Development Theories.
McElhenny, A., (2009) Maturation Theory.

Oswalt, A., (2012) Child & Adolescent Development. 

No comments:

Post a Comment